27
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Good for him, I personally think null-ls should be a core functionality rather than a plugin.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Totally. Developing against internal APIs is always a pain and it takes a special kind of motivation to keep a project like this alive for as long as he has.

I can understand the core team as well though. Doing what null-ls is kind a nice in principle, but 90% of what people is it for can be done differently without hooking deep into the LSP client like that. I get why they don't want to commit to opening those APIs for what seems to be mostly niche cases.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
27 points (96.6% liked)

Neovim

2110 readers
2 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS