this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
662 points (93.7% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3410 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If workers and tenants do have lots of options, but don’t believe they do, they’re more likely to settle for shitty jobs and housing.

If workers and tenants are settling for shitty jobs and housing, the economy is bad. It doesn't matter if they technically have lots of options because the economy is structured to make them feel like they don't.

Capitalism working as intended 👍

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Firing them into the sun would be extremely expensive. It's cheaper to just send them into deep space.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

OceanGate had the right idea.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Crushing billionaires in the depths of the ocean is actually a good way to get their carbon back into long-term storage

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Good point. Make gravity work for us rather than against us.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It's even cheaper to let them build submersibles.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The weird thing is, these information asymmetries make capitalism less efficient than it would be with less asymmetry. They don't serve the interests of capital; they serve the interests of management.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We’ve stopped being capitalist a long time ago. Now we have corporate feudalism. We prop up old companies, tamp down on startups, and do our best to make sure companies make most of their money from rent seeking.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

(pst that's just capitalism)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Marx characterized this as "anarchy of production" - without centralize control, the whims of the market inevitably undermine economic growth. It's what causes the boom and bust cycles.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think Marx also underestimated the class interest of the managerial class, which shows up rather vividly in actually-existing socialisms as well. Principal/agent problems are a doozy.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Maybe.

I think Marx underestimated the class divisions created by colonialism between colonizers and the colonized. It turns out that settlers could be bribed with the superprofits created through the superexploitation of colonized people. It took later theorizing by Lenin and Mao and Fanon and Du Bois to advance theory to that point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, although once we foreground the concept of "colonialism" it also crops up in those socialist contexts too: see the Bolsheviks' treatment of Ukraine, or the ongoing maintenance of North Korea as a source of slave labor.