this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
262 points (98.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43946 readers
673 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Who doesn't like bicycles? I mean, cyclists are often very reckless, dangerous people on the road, and bike lanes are sometimes more of a safety hazard.

Bikers get a lot of hate because a lot of them act like pedestrians. (i.e. riding on sidewalks, crosswalks, not stopping at stop signs, not signalling turns or shoulder-checking) But then if you do all of that dumb law-abiding stuff like some kind of responsible citizen, people in cars honk at you, give you their right of way, or worse!

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

cyclists would not need to do those things if there was proper infrastructure and if car drivers weren't out to kill them.

making bikes come to a complete stop is less safe because of the acceleration curve of a bike, if the way is clear it's safer the cyclist and anyone else around for the cyclist to maintain speed

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Regardless, the law states that a vehicle must stop at a stop sign. Bikes are considered vehicles, and thus must come to a complete stop.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the law doesn't determine what is safest, physics does.

the law also varies by jurisdiction and in some places having cyclists treat stop signs like yields rather than full stops is the law.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Really? I didn't know that! Where I'm from it's different. That's good to know, thank you! Have a lovely day, and stay safe out there.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

found the truck driver who tries to kill every cyclist they see

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm a cycling instructor. I teach people how to cycle safely and in accordance with laws.

Have a lovely day, thanks for your input. I'm happy someone was ready to discuss with me!

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

you really think someone would do that? just go on the internet and tell lies?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't follow, sorry.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, cyclists are often very reckless, dangerous people on the road

you should try interacting with cars as a pedestrian or cyclist. There are people driving on the roads now that I wouldn't trust to safely ride in a pram let alone use of heavy machinery at high speed in a public area based on a test they did years ago. If car use was held to the same standard as safely using heavy machinery in an industrial environment a lot of people who drive now wouldn't be let near a car. It's like people think they have a god given right to operate heavy machinery despite having no ability (or inclination) to do so safely and doing it around children

also bikes don't actually have turn signals and when you use your arm to signal it means you have less control of the bike while you do it

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's why you have to practice signalling so that you can maintain control over the bike while signalling. It's tricky, though, especially for less experienced cyclists. Have a lovely day and thanks for the insight!

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I ride on the sidewalk when I can because I do not want to be run over by some frothingfash in a truck with a 12" lift who's infuriated by having to see a bicycle

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I can understand that. I know that the laws (and road conditions) differ from place to place. Where I'm from, sidewalk riding is restricted to younger people, and so as a cycling instructor, I cannot advise my students to ride on the sidewalk, as it would be dangerous to pedestrians.

Thanks for your perspective, though! I hope you have a lovely day and most importantly, stay safe out there!

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Who doesn't like bicycles"

proceeds to list every bullshit anti bicycle talking point I've ever heard

Damn those entitled cyclists acting like they're entitled to use the road without getting run over.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

As a cycling instructor, I've been honked at, verbally harassed, and flipped off more times than I can count. The reason I know the anti-bicycle talking points is because my job is to discourage people from becoming like that.

Sorry if it wasn't clear in my comment! Have a lovely day and thank you! Your response made me laugh.