293
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Dalit rights groups hail the vote as a landmark victory in their bid to stop casteism from taking root in the US.


Los Angeles, California - The California state legislature has become the first in the United States to pass a bill banning discrimination based on caste, a centuries-old system of social stratification with roots in South Asia.

On Tuesday, the State Senate passed SB 403 by a margin of 31-5, adding caste as a form of ancestry protected under state civil rights law, as well as education and housing codes.

The bill now heads to the desk of Governor Gavin Newsom, with activists calling on the Democrat to sign it into law.

“I’m proud to stand in solidarity with every person who said they, as a Californian, experienced caste discrimination, and others who say they want it to stop,” Democratic State Senator Aisha Wahab, the bill’s author, said in a news conference on Wednesday.

“We shined a light on a long-hidden form of discrimination thousands of years old, invisible shackles on the wrist of millions of people.”

The passage of the bill, supported by a wide array of civil rights and social justice organisations, has been hailed as the most significant victory yet in combatting casteism in North America.

Before its passage in California’s Senate, the bill had also cleared the State Assembly on August 29 with a 55-3 vote, a sign of broad support.

Dalits, who occupy the lowest rung of the caste system, say that caste-based discrimination remains prevalent within the South Asian diaspora, taking place in workplaces, classrooms and social settings.

Caste has existed for millennia in countries like India, which formally abolished the system following the country’s independence in the late 1940s. However, Dalits say discrimination and violent enforcement of social division have remained persistent realities.

In California, some members of the Dalit community say they only became aware of their caste after experiencing discrimination from privileged-caste individuals.

“My family never talked about caste or told me about us being Dalit,” Shahira Kaur, who worked with the Dalit rights group Equality Labs to promote the bill, said in a briefing following last week’s State Assembly vote.

That started to change, she said, when she overheard her friend’s mother refer to her as a “chamar”, a slur used against Dalits, in high school.

“That was a very hard moment,” she said, adding that some of her South Asian friends stopped associating with her at school afterwards. One friend even asked her to sit at a separate lunch table because she was “dirty”.

Governor Newsom has not commented on the bill, but activists are confident that the wide margins by which it passed in the State Senate and Assembly indicate it will successfully be signed into law.

“We united hundreds of organisations to come together with one purpose: to make our state more accessible for opportunity for all and to free out institutions from discrimination,” Thenmozhi Soundararajan, the director of Equality Labs, said at Wednesday’s news conference.

Soundararajan added that she and other members of California Coalition for Caste Equity (CCCE), an alliance of groups that promoted the bill, have launched a hunger strike in support of its final passage.

“Until this bill becomes law, we will not eat. And part of it is a sacred commitment to love, to unity, to healing and reconciliation. Because we believe that we are stronger together,” she said.

While SB 403 passed with relatively little resistance in the state legislature, it faced fierce opposition from a number of Hindu American groups, who are now calling on Newsom to veto it.

“This divisive bill that still implicitly singles out/targets South Asians must be vetoed @GavinNewsom!” the Hindu American Foundation (HAF) said in a social media post following the bill’s passage in the State Assembly.

Such groups dispute that caste-based discrimination is a serious issue in North America and argue that the legislation singles out Hindus.

Dalit rights groups firmly rejected those claims and have portrayed them as a form of backlash against political mobilisation by caste-oppressed people.

“While my staff and I have always seen this as a common-sense bill, it has not been an easy bill,” Senator Wahab, who is California’s first Afghan-American female legislator, said on Wednesday. “There has been a lot of discussion, misinformation and, frankly, bigoted comments directed at me, as well as the larger movement.”

Other supporters of the bill also deny that it will open the door to discrimination against South Asians.

“Caste is a brutal system of social stratification. It is the antithesis of equality and human dignity,” Kiran Gill, director of the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund (SALDEF), told Al Jazeera over a recent phone call.

“The Sikh community has experienced civil rights abuses. We know what it means to be marginalised, and we felt the need to support and uplift this cause.”

While the California bill marks the most significant effort yet to bring caste under the protection of civil rights law, it follows a string of victories in cities and municipalities across North America.

The US city of Seattle voted to ban discrimination based on caste in February. The following month, the school board for the Canadian city of Toronto moved to recognise caste-based discrimination and work towards a framework for combatting it.

“We thank Kshama Sawant who started this in the Seattle City, Aisha Wahab who initiated this in California,” Anil Wagde, an activist with the group Americans Against Caste Discrimination, told Al Jazeera.

After the bill passed the State Assembly last week, supporters gathered outside of the State Capitol building to celebrate with chants honouring Dalit civil rights leader Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar, who wrote India’s constitution and was a fierce critic of the oppressive nature of the caste system.

“Jai bhim! Jai bhim!” the crowd chanted, using a slogan popular among Dalits. It translates to: “Victory to Bhim!”


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Reasoning like this is how people get ostracized from society. No one exists on an island. A minority of people cannot be allowed to form a business or a private group that then tells other people human rights don't apply to them. This kind of reasoning leads to institutions like slavery and authoritarian dictatorships.

Human rights persist where the government ends. Individual freedom does not mean the freedom to oppress others. Saying human rights issues should be left to individual groups or businesses is no different than saying that private groups or businesses should be able to oppress minorities.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

There is no right to force other people to provide services or interact with you. To the contrary actually, free association is actually a right.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

There is no right to ostracize people based on inherent characteristics.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

It seems you fail to understand how free association works. You absolutely have the right to ostracize others

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe in an authoritarian dictatorship, but not in the United States. We judge people based on their actions here, not the characteristics they were born with. Society is built by people for people. Once the society serves only itself or only a minority of people, it becomes a defunct, useless artifact that must be disposed of.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Absolutely wild how you equate basic freedoms with an authoritarian dictatorship

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Oppressing minorities isn't your right, it's a human rights violation. If you go around oppressing people the only prize you get is a jail cell.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

There is no oppression in exercising your free association

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Free associate based on characteristics a person can't control is oppression. I'll spell it out as many times as I have to. Try again.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

Just regurgitating the same falsehood doesn't make it true bub

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly, you lying about freedom of association to cover up oppression via caste systems isn't fooling anyone.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Lmao you guys are really dedicated to your defamation

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'm dedicated to telling the truth and calling out the bullshit.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

You're not very good at it since all you've done is sling defamatory remarks

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I've refuted your central point.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[-] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

No, all you did there was sling lies about me

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I saw through your lies. It wasn't hard.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

Buddy you didn't see through shit. All you did was scheme up some bullshit I never said, and insisted that I totally meant it despite repeatedly telling you I didn't.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It was easy. People try to weaponize their supposed, vaguely defined, personal freedoms to strip other people of their real human rights all the time.

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
293 points (97.4% liked)

politics

18881 readers
4649 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS