686
OpenAI confirms that AI writing detectors don’t work
(arstechnica.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
686 points (95.6% liked)
Technology
58164 readers
3455 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Couldn't you just ask ChapGPT whether it wrote something specific?
Then you have that time that a professor tried to fail his whole class because he asked chatGPT if it wrote the essays.
https://wgntv.com/news/professor-attempts-to-fail-students-after-falsely-accusing-them-of-using-chatgpt-to-cheat/
Could you please provide a brief overview? This article is not available in my country/region.
It cites this article, which might work for you.
Thank you very much
It doesn't have "memory" of what it has generated previously, other than the current conversation. The answer you get from it won't be much better than random guessing.
Ignoring the huge privacy/liabillity issue... there are other llm's then chatgpt.
The model is only trained to handle 4k tokens, roughly 2000 words depending on complexity. Even if it had a log of everything asked it wouldn't be able to use any of it.
That doesn't really work because it just says whatever half the time. It's very good at making stuff up. It doesn't really get that it needs to tell the truth because all it's doing is optimising for a good narrative.
That's why it says slavery is good, because the only people asking that question clearly have an answer in mind, and it's optimising for that answer.
Also it doesn't have access to other people's sessions (because that would be hella dodgy) so it can't tell you definitively if it did or did not say something in another session, even if it were inclined to tell the truth.
No. The model doesn't have a record of everything it wrote.
Obviously not. Its a language generator with a bit of chat modeling and reinforcement learning, not an Artificial General Intelligence.
It doesn't know anything, it doesn't retain memory long term, it doesn't have any self identity. There is no way it could ever truthfully respond "I know that I wrote that".