this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
209 points (97.7% liked)
World News
32310 readers
780 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
sadly thats not punjab and those house were illegal
First, the word is 'illegal'. Second, the houses are only illegal if a court has found them to be encroaching on public property. Third, even if they are illegal, the owners have to first be served notice to vacate. (It appears they were not.)
Also I mentioned the Punjab HC's verdict because in India the judgement of a High Court or the Supreme Court establishes a legal precedent that applies across the entire country.
thanks for pointing out my mistake in spelling
thanks fo assuming
https://www.hindustantimes.com/cities/delhi-news/pwd-demolishes-illegal-slums-near-pragati-maidan-101685643834416.html
if my spelling is wrong is correct it in your head
Thanks for the source. But I was saying they do not seem to have been served notice. I made that assumption based on this line:-
'Residents … alleged that the demolitions were carried out in complete violation of laws … that eviction notices were only served as bulldozers were rolling into their street.'
(Source: https://www.thehindu.com/article66838590.ece)
I haven't listened to the complete podcast, and I'm sure this is just one side of the story; the municipality will have their own version.
thanks