this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
309 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

59298 readers
4608 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
309
Why This Award-Winning Piece of AI Art Can’t Be Copyrighted (www.wired.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
120 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Why This Award-Winning Piece of AI Art Can’t Be Copyrighted::Matthew Allen’s AI art won first prize at the Colorado State Fair. But the US government has ruled it can’t be copyrighted because it’s too much “machine” and not enough “human.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He's lying though. He's pretending the original (wierdly blurry) output was the only AI output, but the details and basically everything else is also AI generated. Nothing is his own skill, brushstroke or even artistic effort/craft, other than prompting the machine-image-generator that he sources the work from.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I only have this article to go on, and it does not suggest that at all. What sources do you have that show he is lying about his input to the artwork?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I follow artists on twitter. And they pointed out that he was trying to imply that the details were his own work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who is they? Do you have links?

I'm not trying to be critical or skeptical, just want to be as informed as possible.