this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
346 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

60076 readers
3561 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sweden is testing a semi-truck trailer covered in 100 square meters of solar panels::A Swedish manufacturer wants to harness green energy from a cargo trailer's free real estate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Those don't exist.

No one said it does.

Generally speaking, solar panels aren’t optimized for near-constant traveling. As such, it’s “fairly involved from a technical point of view,” said Falkgrim. Despite only recently starting prototype testing on Sweden’s public roads, he explained the project is “about seeing if the solution makes sense, and so far we believe it does.” Although such a design isn’t expected to become widespread on roadways for a few years, Scania’s initial testing shows the tech is not only feasible, but promising.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

While they could do things to mitigate the angle of incidence, ultimately that same photovoltaic material will fare better angled consistently toward where the sun might be. If you've run out of room everywhere else, sure, time to look at trailers. But so long as we have spare other places, those are better places.

The trailer might be going through shaded areas, there's only so much optics can do to correct for angle of incidence, and the added weight means we are using energy to move them around when they'd be better off stationary anyway.

Even residential solar is a dubious proposition, since you have to work around roof lines that are rarely optimal for solar. In that case it can make some sense for owning your own generation, particularly with battery, to go "off grid", but I have a hard time imagining similar for the trailer.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Thing is, we're no where close to running out of room. There's lots of land to use. I cannot speak for every country, but the US for sure has vast areas of nothing. A truck stop with a solar array nearby storing it for when the trucks stop buy to me makes way more sense to me at least.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Depends on how much power you can efficiently harness I'd imagine

A 220 watt solar panel will somewhat efficiently charge a 12v battery on a clear day

An electric car uses about an 800v battery(s) which is about 67 normal batteries. Let's go ahead and say a small truck would take twice that and hey to make it a round number let's call it 2000v. That means you would need a solar panel that can produce 440,000 watts or .44 Megawatts.

Some Google fu shows that to harness an entire megawatt(1 million watts) you'd need about 5000 conventional solar panels which on the ground would take up about 5-10 acres. Pretty impractical to put half that on the back of a truck I'd say.

You'd have to have some extremely efficient solar panels to make it practical methinks. Might work on smaller cars though. Anyone feel free to jump in here and get me with an epic slam though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it certainly seems like a challenge. I'll be interested in seeing where they go with it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Those don’t exist.

No one said it does.

Pretty sure these solar panels aren’t just your regular residential or commercial building panels. They are specially made for this purpose.

This you?