74
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

The answer is unions with oversight and regulations to combat the corruption that seems to spring up inside union management.

Workers deserve a bigger piece of the profit pie than management does -- because management doesn't put in 243x more effort or hours than workers do.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is not a union issue. They cannot and definitely will not demand a monitored change to the finances of a company. It'd reduce their viability and thus reduce union officials' grift.

(After working under three indolent unions, I claim their goals have changed and they're only interested in union dues instead of preventing (in order) two-tiered workforces, unsafe hot/bright/loud/cramped environments during covid, and finally dead-naming staff)

This is a taxation issue and, more simply, a change back to more and higher levels of taxation over a certain gross income. The guy pulling in over a million a year needs to pay a bit more.

And maybe, just maybe, have the values rise with inflation, okay? People making 50k should be taxed to the same percentage the 50k guys were in 1970.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
74 points (98.7% liked)

New Democratic Party

587 readers
1 users here now

For those that seek a future that brings together the best of the insights and objectives of people who, within the social democratic and democratic socialist traditions, have worked through farmer, labour, co-operative, feminist, human rights and environmental movements, and with First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples, to build a more just, equal, and sustainable Canada within a global community dedicated to the same goals.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS