this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
322 points (98.8% liked)
Asklemmy
43940 readers
457 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
FTL. Theme song triggers ptsd in my wife.
I love FTL but I'm so bad at it.
I could hear the opening sound of the title song vividly as soon as I read that. I liked it but somehow never played it much. I think it was missing a little bit here or there.
I only played it so that I won once, and that was a long time ago. Is it really replayable? It didn't really seem so at the time.
It's a rogue like. It was built to be replayed endlessly.
Just because it has random level generation/is a roguelike does not mean it has endless replayability. Generally, if you have seen most random events and it's not really challenging anymore because you got "too" good at the game, it loses its appeal for many, as it did for me.
What I'm asking was more in the sense of, have I missed things? Is there more content than I thought there was? I thought for a roguelike it had pretty limited alternative options to see. Essentially, what makes your 100th run different from your 99th run?, and the answer for me was "not much"