this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
48 points (100.0% liked)

Star Wars

4877 readers
49 users here now

Discussion for all things Star Wars. Movies, books, games, TV shows and more are welcome.

1. Keep it civil.

2. Keep it Star Wars related.

3. No memeposts. Memes are great and everybody loves them, but there is already [email protected] for those.

Community icon art from DeviantArt user DavidDeb.

Banner art by Ralph McQuarrie.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Another week, another discussion thread for the new episode. What did y'all think? Lots of opinions last week, not all of them good

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think continuity in actors is anywhere near as absolutely critical as you seem to think it is. It was a neat touch that they dubbed in the digital appearance of Mark Hamill / Carrie Fisher / Peter Cushing, but I don't think that means they need to do it every time - I see that as more akin to an Easter egg. When they've done this, it's mostly for characters with small cameo roles, like Luke showing up in The Mandalorian. And I certainly wouldn't approve of yet more retrospective tinkering with the OT - that time has passed.

I think most fans' immersion can cope just fine with Genevieve O'Reilly, who we're plenty accustomed to playing Mon Mothma, continuing to be her visual appearance in post-OT media. The same way we cope just fine with Vader with mask off in RotJ looking like Sebastian Shaw, and not a digitally-aged Hayden Christensen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, the visual continuity is something that I can look past in this case. It would be a nice-to-have, not a need-to-have. Retaining the actor also isn’t relevant for cases where a transformative event or an extended period of aging has occurred (ex. unmasked Vader in RotJ, Anakin growing up between TPM and AotC, Obi-Wan between Kenobi and ANH, Boba from AotC to The Mandalorian)