this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)
SneerClub
989 readers
2 users here now
Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.
AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)
This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.
[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
i had a previous rant about literary Bayesianism https://reddragdiva.dreamwidth.org/608652.html
@dgerard Thank you for “Garbage in, LessWrong out”, I’m going to use it *so* much 🤣
@utterfiction @dgerard
"I have Bayesian priors
YOU have cognitive biases
THEY are toxoplasmotic SJW filth"
@billseitz @utterfiction @dgerard followed by
“Bayesian means the ingroup can do no wrong and the outgroup can do no right, and the more gooder the ingroup and badder the outgroup the more Bayesian it is.”
savage and true. Now THOSE are how to end a blog post.
@sb @utterfiction @dgerard Fuck Around and Update Your Priors
@billseitz @sb @utterfiction @dgerard Thanks for this, guys. All I can do is add this old, precious post by Stephen Bond.
https://web.archive.org/web/20130910231534/http://www.plover.net/~bonds/cultofbayes.html
the thing that pisses me off most is that bayesian probability is such an interesting field and in stripping the mathematical content out of it, they destroy what makes it so interesting.
this is a good analysis and I wholeheartedly agree.