Transparency report: broken images and federated CSAM attack (lemmy.basedcount.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Images posted within the last 48 hours will appear as broken. This is expected and intended.

Yesterday 2023-08-27 a community on the lemmy.world instance received multiple posts containing CSAM (or as it is more commonly known CP) content, which spread throughout the federation. We also ended up becoming involuntary hosts of said content.

Due to the severely limited nature of the Lemmy moderation tools, removing or purging the incriminated posts from the admin UI wasn't sufficient and didn't cause the images to be actually removed from our server. Because of this, a nuclear option was required. I have deleted every image saved by our server during the last 48 hours.

Unfortunately this also includes a post on [email protected] , as well as multiple posts on [email protected]. Authors of the affected posts can fix them by re-uploading their images, without the need to recreate the posts.

We are sorry for the inconvenience, but hosting CSAM content is highly illegal and we simply can't take any risks on this front.

I am currently discussing with the other admins whether further measures are necessary, to prevent this from happening in the future. We'll keep you posted if we have any updates.

EDIT [2023-08-28 10:00 UTC]:

The attack is still ongoing. I have now blocked the community and further deleted the last 15 minutes of images.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

For federated purges, would it make sense for a purging instance to send an automated notice of contaminated content to all federated instances? Then admins can set whether they want to handle it manually or automatically?

But it seems like it should be possible to purge recent posts only from a particular instance only.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, it does make a lot of sense. But given the current state of Lemmy I doubt we can expect such a high degree of interactivity on the admin side. I think we will more likely get a dumb checkbox that, when ticked, will automatically purge the content without asking for an admin's opinion.

And hell, after this, I would tick it without thinking twice.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I would too if i were you. But at least that way if people are abusing the feature there would be the option to prevent it. Is the developement discussion for lemmy here on lemmy or on git?

This is exactly the sort of thing that the centralized services could use to try to stop federation; smooth handling of this shit ought to be a developement priority.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Is the developement discussion for lemmy here on lemmy or on git?

I'd say the bulk of the discussion happens in github issues. There's also a matrix room dedicated to the development of Lemmy but it hasn't received much traffic lately.

this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023

21 points (100.0% liked)

Announcements and Meta

100 readers

1 users here now

A community reserved for communications from the Based Count admin team to its users.

Occasionally we will also hold community polling in here. Make sure to subscribe to not miss any updates.

Everyone is welcome to join the discussion! We accept suggestions on how to run the instance from everybody, including users from other instances.

Posting to this community is restricted to the admin team to avoid spam, however feel free to speak your mind about the status of the instance and how you'd improve it in our [email protected] community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]