this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
7 points (81.8% liked)
StupIDPol: A based critique of essentialism
77 readers
1 users here now
A federated homage to the subreddit of the same name. The original idea is a marxist take on identity politics and the stupidity inherent in it, but we're fresh out of marxists to run this joint.
Until any marxists step forward to take over, this is a place to post well-tempered stories and commentary about the bonkers world of identity politics.
We got rules, so learn 'em:
- Follow the site-wide Terms of Service
- Try your best to keep comments based. Low effort trash talk and profanity aren't in keeping with the spirit of the community
- We're inspired by communists, so yes the moderators can and will abuse our power
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, while I tend to agree, "nazi bar" is the can of worms that always comes with this kind of thing. We had real examples of that in the segregationist South. That's not a part of history that needs repeating, so a good argument for some limited government restrictions on how open a business needs to be.
I support the business's right to refuse service to cops while on duty and armed though. That's a different story than racism since a cop can come back after their shift (or even probably just leave their gun in the car). It's not refusing based on what they are, but rather on something they're doing at that moment.
That said, while I support the business's right to do this, I also think they're making a dumb decision. The good thing about America is you're free to be a dummy if you want.
That "something they are" vs "something they do" distinction is so subtle yet so critical.
The sensible, nuanced take.