this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
310 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37712 readers
312 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Didn't Elon wante to end remote work? Seems like he needs to make up is mind...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Naah. This is (in his POV) excelent. He can just fire an e-mail at 3:00AM saying: "Everyone from Boulder will have to check in to the SF office by tomorrow. If you fail to do so, I'll assume you abandoned work and is no longer employed at Twitter".

What a POS...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thankfully the laws aren't always super dumb and take into account pretext. For example, if he said "If you don't show up to work in San Francisco then I will take that as your resignation." then it would be what's called a constructive dismissal. It is in fact a termination, because the demands are so unreasonable precisely in order to get employees to quit. So he'd still be on the hook for any severance owed, etc

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So he’d still be on the hook for any severance owed, etc

He's being sued left and right for.... *checks notes.... not paying severance. So I'm not so sure "on the hook for severance" means much either.

load more comments (1 replies)