this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
523 points (98.3% liked)
Asklemmy
43908 readers
1493 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Lack of knowledge in linguistics (or languages in general) is also what stopped my conlang project in its tracks.
As for creating alternate alpha-characters, that's where I got my start. I thought it'd be cool to replace Latin alphabet characters with my own symbols, and things went on from there. Like, I think it's nifty to have a symbol for the 'sh' sound, or I've noticed that I encounter a certain sound combination a lot of times. And then it got kinda out of hand and I decided to simplify things a bit, and then added back more symbols, but with more thought given to it this time around. A few more cycles of that happened over the many years I've worked on my script.
Yeah I've had this issue too, but it hasn't stopped me trying. I do try my best to understand the linguistics stuff enough to make sure my language is making sense, but it feels like a never-ending battle as there's always more you can learn and add. I'm kinda fine with that though, and if it weren't for conlanging I wouldn't have realised I was into linguistics and started studying it at university.
Ah, indeed. If I am remembering things correctly, I was like "huh, so there are a lot of things I need to learn about languages in order to pull this off, but where do I start?" I guess I could have just started with what I know, adapting my native language's verb system and fusing it with Esperanto's word-building mechanism, which would have made things really agglutinative with affixes for the verb's tense, mood, and whatnot with roots that can themselves be combinations of simpler roots. Like, I guess
++[ + ... + ]+. However, considering how little I know of the actual machinations of my native language's verb system....It's also a shame that I was already six years into a five year course when I even had a clue I was into this. Am I just making excuses for myself? Likely. But yeah.
I get that perfect can be the enemy of good (or any progress), and I should probably just start, but I'm aware that I am not that into linguistics and I want to spend my time other places. That's awesome that it helped you figure out what you wanted to do though, that's a huge win.