this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
31 points (89.7% liked)

Canada

7202 readers
337 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Ontario government says Greenbelt land will not be part of a new subdivision it's proposing to fast-track in Caledon, weeks after residents were warned the province planned to use its authority to develop on a portion of the protected area.

Shortly before Thursday's meeting, the province told both CBC Toronto and the town that contrary to what was included in the proposal, Greenbelt lands would remain protected.

Two weeks ago, the province's auditor general found the government's process for choosing those sites favoured a small group of well-connected developers who now stand to make billions of dollars.

"The environmentally sensitive features on that site will be harmed by putting dense housing development right there," Connors said, speaking earlier to CBC Toronto before the meeting.

In its comments, the conservation authority said it opposed development on the site because of natural hazards, including floodplains associated with tributaries of the Etobicoke Creek, and the inclusion of Greenbelt land.

"Through the consultation process it was brought to our attention that the amendment — as submitted by the proponent — contained a section of lands located within the Greenbelt," Poulos wrote in an email statement.


The original article contains 1,026 words, the summary contains 181 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Two weeks ago, the province's auditor general found the government's process for choosing those sites favoured a small group of well-connected developers who now stand to make billions of dollars.

That sounds like something illegal that needs to be further investigated, no? Do we not have laws against blatant corruption?