this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)
Programming Challenges
234 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to the programming.dev challenge community!
Three challenges will be posted every week to complete
- Tuesday (Easy)
- Thursday (Medium)
- Saturday (Hard)
Easy challenges will give 1 point, medium will give 2, and hard will give 3. If you have the fastest time or use the least amount of characters you will get a bonus point (in ties everyone gets the bonus point)
Exact duplicate solutions are not allowed and will not give you any points. Submissions on a challenge will be open for a week.
A leaderboard will be posted every month showing the top people for that month
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Rust
Seems I'm a bit late to the party so here's something I quickly slapped together. The problem appears to be asking us to generate all
n
-ary words in the Dyck languageD3
withπ΄ = {(, ), [, ], {, }}
andπ‘ = {((, )), ([, ]), ({, })}
. This grows in the order of3βΏβΈΒ²πββΈβ
, whereπβ
is thek
-th Catalan number, since it combines the regular up/down decision problem at each lattice step with a 3-way decision problem of picking a bracket type. That quickly becomes A Lotβ’ β napkin math tells me it would take ~21GB to store all possible strings of lengthn = 20
, delimited by newlines, as UTF-8 bytes β which made me think that I would want to do this in constant space instead of recursively, so I quickly Googled to see what prior art there was on generating functions for generalized Dyck languages and found a nice and short paper [1] claiming to be linear in the length of the words (not the quantity of them, that's still A Lotβ’) and using constant space. I cribbed their algorithm and reduced it to the specifics ofD3
with the givenπ΄
andπ‘
, and then used the fact that it can generate the next word using only the previous one to split the word-space into three equal parts that can be generated on as many threads. I chose three because the pattern required to recognize the end of each third was already the same one being used by the paper's algorithm, (and because three seemed nice considering it'sD3
and|π‘| = 3
and such), but you could ostensibly split the space into as many chunks as you have processors without penalty (beyond the overhead of the threads themselves plus fighting for the mutex lock onstdout
) if you can recognize the chunk-ending patterns fast enough. After tweaking the buffer size to match my system setup (Arch on an i7 Kaby Lake), I can get it to pipe ~2GB/s towc -l
(which is ~11s for thatn = 20
example). I'm sure there's probably a bunch more that I could optimize but I'm afraid of SIMD and don't want to think too hard about the algorithm, so I'll just leave it here and let someone else tell me how I'm wrong / what I missed :)[1]: Liebehenschel, J., 2003. Lexicographical generation of a generalized dyck language. SIAM Journal on Computing, 32(4), pp.880-903.