World News

32363 readers

241 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Farmer ordered to pay after judge says thumbs-up emoji amounts to contract acceptance (www.theglobeandmail.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

People, the defendant had a history of using 👍to accept a contract with the aggrieved. Had done it NP a dozen times before. He was trying to use a technicality to weasel out of breaching a contract he obviously agreed to when he couldn’t fulfill it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Did the article actually say he accepted with thumbs up before? Thought it just said he'd accepted via text.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point is that now there's a precedent and going forward, that emoji counts as a signature

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Not quite, and for 2 reasons:

I'm not sure if it is the same in Canada, but in the US it is only a 'precedent' if ruled by an appeals court, and
The Judge found the Defendant had a history of tersely accepting agreed upon (by later full completion of) contracts. If, for example you had texted me a similar contract and historically when you did I typically answered "yes, I agree to these contract details. Expect Flax in the Fall", but one time I texted 👍and then a day later said "nah, I don't agree to this contract" you'd have a case but I'd almost certainly win under the same Judge because now the argument 'the 👍 was just confirming receipt but not approval of the contract' holds water.