this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

989 readers
18 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Is there a statistical analysis that could prove (or disprove) that GrAImes (hey grimes, you can have that for free) is generated from her tweets? In any case, this is hilarious.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@swlabr @gnomicutterance The chatgpt likes run out of tokens right? Or is that just a constraint by the people running it to reduce costs?

Anyway, iirc her EX/Xdaddy also runs sockpuppets so I wouldn't be surprised if she did too.

Anyway all those 'I used an AI to generate X, here are the responses' were also highly edited things a few years back. Easier to just write something yourself and pretend it was AI generated for clout.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, don't get me wrong. I don't think any of this is AI generated at all. I think it's funny either way though, and it would be funnier if it could be proven either way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@swlabr Occam’s Razor says it’s just her attention-seeking with a sockpuppet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Ok, ok, but what would Bayes say

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Are we sure it isn't Musk behind the "AI"?