this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
13 points (84.2% liked)

World News

32363 readers
241 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

πŸ‘ can also be sarcastic, like your contract is so dumb, I'm not even properly replying to it. Such a dumb ruling.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't make snap judgements about rulings. Especially just on article titles. In this particular case the defendant had a history of using πŸ‘to accept a contract. Had done it NP a dozen times before. He was trying to use a technicality to weasel out of breaching a contract when he couldn't fulfill it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder what amount of damages he was ordered to pay?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago