this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
179 points (76.2% liked)

privacy

363 readers
1 users here now

Rules (WIP)

  1. No ad hominem allowed
  2. Attack the idea, not the poster

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, the website you linked to is the correct data. Of course how stupid of me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wikipedia, yes. It's publicly editable and verifiable by anyone.

Nationalpriorities.org is a pile of propaganda designed to fool you. You don't even know who's running it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wikipedia? umm no it's not, it is state propaganda with mostly lies and official narratives. are you retarded?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, that would clearly be you at this point.

The state does not own, or run Wikipedia, it's a non-profit organization. And if you find something wrong on a Wikipedia page, then find a source for correction and correct it.

And who exactly runs that crap site you posted?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

They lock edits and it is controlled. Find one Wikipedia page that contradicts the state narrative. Only mainline propaganda is allowed there any other information is automatically labled conspiracy.

It is full of bias and lies as well as baseless character assassinations. It is fully controlled by leftists. You are a leftist so you think it is free and open.