this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
10 points (77.8% liked)
Fuck Cars
912 readers
377 users here now
Your hub for collection of materials that contribute to a world with less car ownership. Including buses, motorcycles, bicycles, skateboards, longboards, scooters, hoverboards, e-scooters, pedestrians, walking, running
Community can decide if: truck have a place here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Bicycle lanes benefit car drivers: every bicycle on a bike lane removes one car and one bicycle from the road. Bike lanes take much less space and maintenance than car lanes.
They also benefit people who use transit, as they reduce transit ridership during peak hours.
With bike lanes pedestrians don't have to suffer as many bicycles in the sidewalk, as fewer cyclists are scared of riding elsewhere.
Bike lanes benefit car drivers if and only if bike lanes encourages more bikes. Taking away one entire car lane to put two not often used bike lanes benefits nobody - and that is the case in the city I cited.
I'm all for infrastructure improvements, I just don't think bike lanes is the way to go. Perhaps once mass transit is introduced, we can reduce car lanes for bike lanes, but I don't believe the area I used to live is at that stage yet.
In practice, transit only works in sufficiently dense neighborhoods. It is either not economical or not frequent enough in typical North American suburbs. Bike lanes work in suburbia: you place them in roads where the speed and frequency of car traffic is currently discouraging would-be cyclists.
Bike lanes cost pennies and you offen don't need to take any car lanes away because you can simply paint the existing car lanes a little narrower.