555
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

This woman will be like 70 paying for the sins of a crazy 17 year old she doesn't know or understand. Reminds me of Shawshank Redemption. I can feel bad for the victims while also empathizing with the life of the perp being lost and wasted as well

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Though I mostly agree with your I do wonder what you'd think if this wasn't a cute sexy teenager but a fat 25 year old black girl. Or worse, an ugly black guy.

I'm reading these comments and find weirdly a lot of "aahhhwww poor her" messages and I can't escape the feeling it's because she's young and pretty

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unfortunately she made a decision that KILLED SOMEONE with the intent of KILLING SOMEONE.

Her victims will never get to be 70. Let her rot.

And you’re acting like that 70 year old is innocent. That 70 year old intentionally murdered someone because she was upset. Yeah it was 53 years ago but that’s the same person. 53 years ago that 70 year old deprived another human being of the rest of their life because she got upset. I don’t think you’d have the same sympathy for other criminals just because their crime was decades ago.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think people might be getting too hung up on the car and thinking it makes this less of a big deal. It's the opposite though imo -- you shoot a loaded gun, it's a split second. You hit someone with a car, you've had plenty of time to think things through. You don't tap the accelerator once and then they're dead. You have to commit to the decision, and actively choose to not hit the brakes or swerve away or throw on the emergency brake.

I have no pity. She knew what she was doing, she chose to do it, and she thought about it beforehand.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you’re the same person at 70 than you were at 17, that’s more of a you problem than anything. Like seriously, that’s not good.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

I’m not claiming the person wouldn’t have any growth or change. The growth or change doesn’t negate that this girl committed premeditated murder.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Nobody argued that it does. They’re arguing that a 70 year old shouldn’t be held responsible for actions they took over 5 decades in the past - from when they were a person so far removed from who they are now that they’re effectively a different person.

No, they’re not literally a different person. Nobody’s actually arguing that lol.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It probably would have made a difference if the victims families could see it this way. It’s not like she ran him over. She crashed the car she was in also. Clearly an unsound mind at work.

Yet they begged for the harshest possible sentence. It won’t be enough for them. But the rest of us get to pay for her incarceration for the rest of her natural life.

this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
555 points (95.9% liked)

News

22886 readers
4598 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS