this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
131 points (96.5% liked)
Asklemmy
43856 readers
1812 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
As a person who doesn't want kids anyway, I might not be the target audience of your question, but I will weigh in regardless.
There are two components here:
Bringing someone to existence when they are likely to inherit this terrible disease.
Having your children experience seeing their parent with this disease.
You don't have to subscribe to anti-natalism to decide that it would be better to not have kids in this situation.
You could however, if you still want to raise children, but don't want to worry about #1, you can adopt. Plus you will spare yourself/your partner the pain and risk of pregnancy and childbirth, while at the same time give a family to a child who has none. Problem #2 will still be there, but depending on the age of the kid you adopt, they won't be as young when/if you develop the symptoms and therefore might be better equipped to handle that.