I didn't say anyone was obligated to agree with me.

I didn't say my outlook was correct. I don't think objective morality exists so I wouldn't say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple.

I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous?

Again, I don't have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it's obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me.

I have never apologized for rapists.

Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions?