102
Sweden raises its terror threat to four out of five after Quran burnings
(www.euronews.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
102 points (92.5% liked)
Europe
8485 readers
3 users here now
News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures
Rules
(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)
- Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
- No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
- No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.
Also check out [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
So publicly burning a certain paper that is the most holy item to millions of people in the world with the sole intent of provoking them by desecration is not malicious? ROFL you can´t be serious, you must be a shill for sure.
Cheap attempt to derail from the actual topic of malicious public Quran burning. Those things are on a whole different level and not part of the discussion here.
You said "malicious as it gets". So can you please answer the question?
You mean that hypocritical question?
Obviously calling mass killings malicious is a diminution and I would strongly refuse doing so because of that. Mass killings are obviously far beyond malicious, more like really fucking evil. Terrorism is another topic because it depends very much on perspective since one persons terrorist is another persons freedom fighter. However the actual question here seems to be why it is so important to you to derail from the actual topic of the discussion, which is the malicious public burning of holy symbols of a world religion to intentionally create more hate and violence in a world that already has way too much of it.
You keep using the word malicious, so in order to move forward, I feel we need to get a sense of your maliciousness scale.
So, punching someone in the face, more or less malicious then burning some paper?
I hope it´s not too sophisticated for you to grasp but the answer to your question depends on context ...
So in this context, answer it.
But you did not provide any. Who is punching who in the face and why? Is it an unprovoked attack or self defense? Who is burning what kind of papers? is it done in private or in public? Does the person who burns the papers own the papers or are the someone else's? Do you even context bro?
Physical violence to another human, versus burning some paper. That's it.
Then I can´t believe you are seriously asking this. Obviously violence against living beings is magnitudes worse than violence against things.
Ok great, we're getting somewhere. You keep calling burning some paper malicious like it's super bad, so we gotta clarify.
Next calibration question. Which is more malicious, calling someone a name, or burning some paper?
You are the only one who needs clarification of such trivial things and I don´t feel like spending time for these kindergarten questions of yours ...