178
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

FTA:

In the long run, advocates of private school vouchers and charter schools may come to regret the Carson decision. By forcing states to choose between either having a single, unitary public school system, or having government-funded private and charter schools that teach religious views many citizens may find objectionable, Carson places secularly minded states in a difficult position. If those states don’t want to fund schools like St. Isidore, or other religious schools that may teach that LGBTQ people are immoral, Carson suggests that they must eliminate any programs funding private schools or publicly funded charter schools altogether.

Nevertheless, the Court’s Republican-appointed majority appears as unconcerned with this problem as it is with the problem of taxing secular citizens to pay for religious education.

The future of religion in the United States, in other words, is unlikely to involve police officers breaking into people’s homes to arrest them for skipping church. But it is likely to include far more government funding of religious activity, far more proselytizing by teachers, coaches, and other government officials who wield authority over children, and many more monuments to Christianity — all paid for by your taxes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah, they weren’t founded by people fleeing Dutch religious tolerance. We were.

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
178 points (97.8% liked)

Atheism

1967 readers
17 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS