this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
303 points (90.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

29647 readers
1326 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics (NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out)
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

If they could somehow monetize breathing, they would

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure most can agree that communism has been tried in village and tribe sized societies through the history of humanity.

It's not the most honest claim to say that big authoritarian states like USSR or China have ever even tried it, and just used the name for marketing and support from gullible population.

Are places like Rojava and Kerala relevant examples? Maybe, I'm not an expert on the subject

Greed is an interesting topic. Capitalism creates and rewards greed and it's prominence in human psychology could be less in alternative systems.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree it works at village-scale, but in my opinion what we have seen is a failure of communism to scale to a nation with tens or hundreds of millions of people, and survive for decades at that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sounds like you'd want some kind of anarcho-communism where those smaller groups of people work together with other ones to form networks encompassing millions. Democracy at human level instead of top-down authorities

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There is still a power incentive. In the proposed system we would likely factions rapidly forming to gather the most power and resources as quickly as possible. It would probably be quite bloody. (What you are describing is effectively the tribe system, which rarely ended well for most tribes.)

As long as resource scarcity exists I just don't see this working out, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In my mentioned system the power would be in cooperation. Fighting against that would lose power.

Resource scarcity is mostly a decision problem. Capitalism doesn't have incentive to let anyone benefit from the excessive resources so those in control won't decide for it.