this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
15 points (94.1% liked)

NZ Politics

561 readers
1 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to the NZ Politics community!

This is a place for respectful discussions about everything that's political and kiwi

This is an inclusive space where diverse opinions are valued, but please don't be a dick

Other kiwi communities here

 

Banner image by Tom Ackroyd, CC-BY-SA

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I think this is an excellent policy, and a long time coming. This is done overseas with good effect. While I don't think it's a magic bullet, it is definitely a step in the right direction.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for your valuable contribution to the conversation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I felt your unrelated argument deserved an equally flippant reply.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you not understand how a lawsuit over classification of food for tax purposes is relevant to a discussion on tax on food?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I understand perfectly what you implied, but since you do not argue in good faith I did not feel the need to reply in kind.

You know full well that the policy as announced by Labour has a simple definition. Processed foods that are changed from their natural form in any way other than freezing are not exempt. Your point about an issue in another country that couldn't happen here is a non sequitur.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why does that specific example need to be able to happen here in order for it to be relevant though? Do you not understand the concept of an example?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why does that specific example mean that something equally as 'bad' will happen here. Do you not understand the concept of different implementations of policy?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't it's an example of what could happen

Genuinely thick, aren't you?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, anything could happen. But that doesn't mean it will. Are we to give up on any progress if there is any risk of slight problems?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is an absolute certainty this will result in extra admin costs as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And I disagree with the certainty. Oh look, we are at an impasse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you genuinely believe this is will result in no additional costs to the administration of the GST scheme?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that it doesn't need to, and that the benefits outweigh the downsides even if it does. I also think zero-rating certain foods has other benefits beyond money, and this should be taken into account.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How? How could you possibly make these changes without adding cost to the administration of the GST scheme?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I firmly believe this is a simple task with modern computer systems. Given that accounting software like Xero already has different categories for different products, it's a simple matter of adding a "fresh produce zero-rated" category.

That being said, even if there is a cost I believe it is still overall net positive.

Honestly mate, at this point, there is no reason to continue discussing the point. I think any potential problems or costs are worth it, and you don't. Lets leave it there, eh?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Given that accounting software like Xero already has different categories for different products, it's a simple matter of adding a "fresh produce zero-rated" category.

If only life was as simple as you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for your valuable contribution to the conversation.