this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
773 points (96.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21273 readers
584 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Only sort of and not fully though.

    A quick run through of some popular distros and reasons you might pick Debian instead of them

    1. Ubuntu - directed fully by a for profit corporation, might at any time go the way of RHEL (Linux Mint already has a mint spin based on Debian in case Canonical shits the bed). Narrower impact on downstream code bases than Debian (though only barely). Ships by default with non free blobs that you must opt out of.
    2. Linux mint - very narrow downstream impact. Not as flexible for how you can set it up as Debian (switching desktop environments is strictly unrecommended, and there's no real reason to run it as a server)
    3. Fedora - relationship with RedHat is concerning, stability is not there at all
    4. RHEL-alikes (Rocky, Alma, etc) - uncertain future, though it does look like SUSE is going to help stabilize them. Downstream impact is relatively narrow, though you'd be surprised
    5. Arch - harder to install, not as suitable for production environments for stability reasons
    6. Manjaro - horrible stability (worse than arch), not as flexible (like linux mint), holds security patches back, almost no downstream impact
    7. Slack - harder to install, package management is annoying
    8. Kali - not for installing on your machine
    9. Gentoo - see arch
    10. MX Linux - a little more flexible than Mint, but otherwise, see mint
    [–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    openSUSE Tumbleweed is basically Arch with a Control Panel and an enterprise backing.

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

    And automatic QA testing insuring a higher level of stability compared to arch. Good defaults with byrfs and snapper out of the box too.

    [–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

    What are your thoughts on PopOS?