sh.itjust.works Main Community

7785 readers

102 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

314

[sh.it.post] We're #5! We're #5! (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

97 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Just saw this on AskLemmy at .ml, thought this and chuckled, and now here we are.

Will take the opportunity to thank our admins for what they do, and all you humans for being here and generally being cool.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It would be nice to see a way of unifying communities on multiple instances for redundancy and improving the situation with redundant communities across instances.

It's really on the mods to accept to consolidate in one community.

All the issues you mention in your other paragraph are why this is probably never going to happen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm mostly talking out a technical solution for community redundancy, similar to setting up redundant VM hosts or more accurately like redundant network hardware, where the data and configurations all exist on both servers, and might be load balanced to some degree between both servers, but ultimately should one go down there's no loss of uptime as the other server takes over until the time that it's mate comes back online or a new one is setup and connected

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

But that's infrastructure redundancy, it should rather happen there than at the Lemmy level, no?