this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
111 points (100.0% liked)
UK Nature and Environment
421 readers
68 users here now
General Instance Rules:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
Community Specific Rules:
- Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
- Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.
Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.
Our winter banner is a shot of Shotley marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Discharge to bodies of water after treatment is normal. Pictured is a normal activated sludge plant, which should be capable of treating effectively. That's the clarifier top left, chlorine contact on right, aeration/digesters on bottom.
It isn't primitive. An imhoff tank and lagoon is primitive, but even those are perfectly capable of treating wastewater. It's almost always that there is more flow now than the plant is designed to handle.
If they are staying within permit, it probably allows more inflow than the plant can handle and has too loose of restrictions on the outflow tests if it is causing harm to the lake.
And why is there more flow now than the plant is designed to handle?
Could it be because they've been taking our money for the last 35 years and giving it to shareholders instead of improving the infrastructure?
Water was a stupid thing to privatise. Even more so than the trains. It needs renationalising.