this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
375 points (98.7% liked)

Opensource

1608 readers
710 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't have a source for that, but the most that any locally-run program can cost in terms of power is basically the sum of a few things: maxed-out gpu usage, maxed-out cpu usage, maxed-out disk access. GPU is by far the most power-consuming of these things, and modern video games make essentially the most possible use of the GPU that they can get away with.

Running an LLM locally can at most max out usage of the GPU, putting it in the same ballpark as a video game. Typical usage of an LLM is to run it for a few seconds and then submit another query, so it's not running 100% of the time during typical usage, unlike a video game (where it remains open and active the whole time, GPU usage dips only when you're in a menu for instance.)

Data centers drain lots of power by running a very large number of machines at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

From what I know, local LLMs take minutes to process a single prompt, not seconds, but I guess that depends on the use case.

But also games, dunno about maxing GPU in most games. I maxed mine for crypto mining, and that was power hungry. So I would put LLMs closer to crypto than games.

Not to mention games will entertain you way more for the same time.