this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
399 points (98.8% liked)

Opensource

1608 readers
746 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In my experiments, local Whisper models I can run locally are comparable to YouTube's — which is to say, not production-quality but certainly better then nothing.

I've also had some success cleaning up the output with a modest LLM. I suspect the VLC folks could do a good job with this, though I'm put off by the mention of cloud services. Depends on how they implement it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Since VLC runs on just about everything, I'd imagine that the cloud service will be best for the many devices that just don't have the horsepower to run an LLM locally.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

True. I guess they will require you to enter your own OpenAI/Anthropic/whatever API token, because there's no way they can afford to do that centrally. Hopefully you can point it to whatever server you like (such as a selfhosted ollama or similar).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

It's not just computing power - you don't always want your device burning massive amounts of battery.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah I've used local whisper and LLMs to automatically summarize Youtube-videos and podcasts to text with good results.

https://github.com/troed/summarize.sh

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cool, thanks for sharing!

I see you prompt it to "Make sure to only use knowledge found in the following audio transcription". Have you found that sufficient to eliminate hallucination and going off track?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Yes I have been impressed with the quality of summaries keeping to the content. I have seen, rare, attribution errors though, where who said what got mixed up in unfortunate ways.