Technology

60116 readers

3060 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

359

The quest to save the world’s largest CRT TV from destruction (arstechnica.com)

submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

CRTs have a huge advantage of not having fixed screen resolution. And my memory is not very good, but I think my eyes really did get tired much slower from them than from LCDs. I guess their size and their dangers were more important.

After all, space and health are very basic concerns in our world.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Our eyes are also much older now

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

If you don't regularly transplant new ones in maybe.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago

[...] but I think my eyes really did get tired much slower from them than from LCDs.

Depends on a refresh rate. < 60 Hz sucks, 75 Hz is acceptable, 85+ Hz ideal.
And how noisy is it, I mean in a high frequency range.