this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
1509 points (97.9% liked)

Antiwork

3795 readers
19 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/[email protected]

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/[email protected]


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hopefully it's hard to prove that his intent was change and not revenge

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You don't engrave a message on casings unless you're sending a message to the living.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's an incredibly flimsy argument. People have been writing messages on ammo since ammo existed. There's not even an established pattern of terrorists writing on ammo - they're more likely to claim credit for an attack after the fact and include their message there.

Those were words for him. Deny and defend this, mother fucker.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You assert my argument is flimsy, yet your argument is that someone is going to be able to read the casings popping out of a guy's gun shooting at him from behind?

Lol. Lmao, even.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Please tell me you're trolling so I don't think I'm talking to someone THIS obtuse.

Do you think this writing was to make a political message in the wreckage? Do you think really I think the soldiers who wrote it expected the victims to read it on the way down?

No, you moron, it's a message to the victim that the killer knows they'll never read. It's a personal touch on the ammo that empowers the shooter. A more poetic version of "a bullet with your name on it"

Added bonus for you

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I love that you called me a moron while double commenting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah because my Lemmy app posting twice is indicative of my intelligence.

I love that you have nothing to say about my comment so you point out the app bug. Very smart

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Damn, that's a lot of words you wrote. Shame I won't be reading them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The company's other employees are, at time of writing, still living, so sending a message to the living doesn't mean it's not solely revenge.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm still like 100% sure that this isn't the same guy in the pictures taken on the crime scene, given that literally ALL THEY HAVE TO GO BY is that his form of dress was the same.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think it's entirely plausible that it's the same guy, but he was tracked down through illegal means and the tip-off was faked. If so, it's reasonable to think that some or all of the physical evidence was planted in order to have something that would be admissible. If evidence was potentially planted, though, it can't be used as the basis for a guilty verdict, so even if Mangione did do it, there might not be enough evidence for a conviction.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You know. I’ve been having a hard time with both the official story and the that’s not the real shooter theory.

Your theory is a third one I haven’t thought of before. He is the shooter but they faked how they found him to protect their secret surveillance capabilities from being reported on. Maybe illegal maybe not, but probably tech they don’t want the public knowing about.

This actually sounds most plausible to me.