this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
776 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19248 readers
2961 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 138 points 5 days ago (2 children)

... had sex with an underage girl...

So, rape? Underage people can't consent, it's rape. He's a pedophile.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yup. The report specifically found he violated FL statutory rape law, among other laws, but headlines continue to not call it what it is.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 days ago (3 children)

America's willingness to elect pedophiles/rapists to the highest positions in their country is... baffling. To then have their news not even use those words just makes me worry so much for women in the US. Like seriously, 'sex with underage girl,' we have specific words for that. Embarrassing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's not baffling. Sad and terrible, but not baffling at all.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Yup. It’s a big club, and we ain’t in it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

As a non-American (Canadian), it's baffling to me. Our Conservatives have been quite horrific in many decisions (like refusing to admit climate change exists, for example), but I do actually think they would turn on one of their own who was a pedophile. Maybe not in a year or so, but for now, I do believe they would. To see people celebrate these monstrous things in their leaders is terrifying.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Just look at religion for answers to that puzzle. The entire schtick is a manual for giving yourself and your friends easy outs from your constant and consistent bad behaviour

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Just look at religion for answers to that puzzle. The entire schtick is a manual for giving yourself and your friends easy outs from your constant and consistent bad behaviour

I guess that could be why; up here in Canada it's political suicide to be openly religious (though I think the Cons will change their tune on that next election.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Stranger things have happened

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

It is baffling, especially since this is the same country where people have been arrested for CP because they had photos of themselves.

It's the double standards in these laws that get me.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago (3 children)

inb4 the weirdos come saying "well she was 17, so he's acktually a hebo whatever blah blah" as if it matters

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

That would matter in New York, just ask Jerry Seinfeld

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

It matters only in that it gives cover to the extra extra sick ones that go after young children.