this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
713 points (96.5% liked)

Science Memes

11431 readers
2274 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
713
DNA (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The amount of grammatical mistakes in your own comment is pretty ironic as well.

Muphry's Law strikes again.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Excuse me, it's Muphry's Theory. It hasn't been proven enough to be a scientific law.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I dont believe in Muphies Theory cause uts just a theory. I've done my own research and u ahoukd to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Hehe I remember Muphies. That Kermit always got up to shenanigans!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Menzies'es Pretty Solid Hunch

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

😆👌 fair enough

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I'm sure this comment can't go wromg.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well then use this as a teaching moment and elaborate then?

I live in a country that uses the King’s English, not the American version so please enlighten me - I do enjoy learning.

But don’t say there are an amount of errors without even trying to quantify them….given the burden of proof rests with you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Fair enough, let's have at it, Mr. "King's English". (God, do you even hear how insufferably pretentious that sounds?)

Let's start with the original comment. My edits in [brackets].

“God safe us” - [the] irony right there[... something? "is funny"? What about the irony? You have to finish the thought.][missing comma] especially when critical of someone else’s use of an acronym[comma] perhaps one’s own grasp of the English language should be a little better!!! [Overuse of exclamation points, although one could argue the level of severity in the contents of your message...]

God save us …. [space between "us" and the ellipsis"; and an extra period after the ellipsis]

Next comment!

Well then[missing comma] use this as a teaching moment and elaborate[missing comma; also another "then"? Then then then then.] then?

I live in a country that uses the King’s English[pretentious af but nothing wrong here], not the American version[missing comma] so please enlighten me - [hyphen instead of en dash] I do enjoy learning. [Good, you're learning right now.]

But don’t say there are ["is an amount", probably? I don't know what the King says, but that's what I would say] an amount of errors without even trying to quantify them….given [again, ellipsis with an extra period; also the weird use of an ellipsis here – it should be a comma] the burden of proof rests with you.

Did you learn something?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

“God safe us” - [the] irony right there[... something? "is funny"? What about the irony? You have to finish the thought.]

That clause was fine up to the missing commas. He's pointing at the phrase and saying that's irony right there. Perhaps you're unfamiliar with that structure. I don't think it's common in all Englishes

[hyphen instead of en dash]

That's pedantic. Nearly no one uses en and em dashes; if they're typing on a physical keyboard those dashes are hard to type

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

Perhaps you're unfamiliar with that structure. I don't think it's common in all Englishes

I am, but it's grammatically insufficient. Idiomatically/colloquially/slang wise, it's fine. I understood enough to know what they mean, obviously.

That's pedantic. Nearly no one uses en and em dashes;

Of course it's pedantic. I'm going out of my way to be pedantic to show this grammar snob what it feels like to throw the first stone.

if they're typing on a physical keyboard those dashes are hard to type

Skill issue. If they care enough, it's easy to find out how. 🤷‍♂️ I use them all the time.

Thanks for joining the fun!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't the first mistake simply him using the sentence to declare there is irony? How is that an incomplete sentence?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Could you clarify? Do you mean to say it's incomplete or actually complete?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I meant to say that part is already a complete sentence.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Now, I'm not as much of a grammar nerd as I'd like to be, but from what I understand, "irony right there" isn't a complete sentence, or barely even a complete clause. It's just a few words that should be part of a clause.

Maybe someone could fill in the grammatical details here, or prove me wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I guess if he wrote "That's irony right there", it would be easier to consider it a complete sentence, so maybe you're right.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Yes – exactly! I think that's actually the missing part here: "That's". It makes the following thing they say sound much more complete. 👍 Thank you!