this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
250 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59979 readers
2663 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
250
US targets TP-Link with a potential ban on the Chinese routers (www.theverge.com)
submitted 18 hours ago by avieshek@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
80 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

TP-link is reportedly being investigated over national security concerns linked to vulnerabilities in its very popular routers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 32 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I'd personally hope they just force open sourcing their firmwares if they want to stay in the market. I really like my Omada stuff, ubiquiti is just a tough pill to swallow on price.

[–] tty5@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

They (FCC) forced firmwares being signed so nobody can install their own on the off chance it unlocks TX power or frequencies not allowed by FCC.

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 hours ago

They should undo this and just prosecute people who abuse the firmware

[–] john89@lemmy.ca 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Can't say I've ever seen an example of signed firmware that didn't exist to further exploit the working class.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You've never used Linux?

Signed firmware just means you can prove a given key was used to sign something. Most Linux distributions sign their packages so you know one of the trusted keys from the maintainers was used to sign the packages (and yes, this includes firmware), which prevents a man-in-the-middle from modifying packages.

The only problem I have with signed firmware is if there's no way to change the acceptable keys. Signing itself is an important security feature, its only problematic if the user can't upload their own signed packages.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Requiring signed firmware is just a lock to keep poors out.

It's Never used for consumers benefit, not once, not ever.

[–] avieshek@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I honestly like the GL.iNet approach in terms of software which is kinda like Android.

[–] pirat@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

I recently bought their Flint 2 (GL-MT6000) based on multiple recommendations online when looking for a router that supports OpenWRT. That's preinstalled, with AdGuard Home and WireGuard VPN on top of it. I'm looking forward to set it up and play around with it.

What do you exactly mean when you describe their approach in software as Android-like? That it's easy to install services in OpenWRT?