this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
61 points (95.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36190 readers
812 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The most cost-effective way will always be a pair of glasses.

I’m too poor and cowardly to have a laser fix my eyes.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Glasses usually have obscene markups. Imo, the most cost effective way is often lasik (or similar), but it's an up front cost.

I think I paid 4k usd for both eyes, but that was something like 10 years ago and with no assistance from insurance.

I still get an eye exam every few years just to make sure everything is okay, but I am expecting another 10 years before I need too start thinking about vision correction again. Also, I'm fairly certain the provider that performed my lasik offered a warranty and would perform additional corrections as I age, but I don't live anywhere near the location anymore.

When I compare that to the combined cost of insurance, exams, glasses, contacts, and prescription sunglasses that my wife pays... lasik was a significant cost savings for me (and that's not counting any quality of life benefits).

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I use my 14-year-old prescription to get a couple pairs of glasses from Zenni every couple years. Averages about $75/yr.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

$75/year seems expensive for Zenni, unless you're going all-out on the fancy features. For that budget, I think it's worth spending some on the optometrist to update your R~x~.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I pay $100 for my eye exam and $150 for my glasses every couple years.

It would take 30+ years for that cost to reach the Lasik levels you paid, and that's assuming I'm not doing anything with the $3750 remaining after the first appointment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

And 30 years after LASIK, you'd be incredibly lucky if your eyes hadn't gotten worse to the point you'd need glasses anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I was paying $500 annually for a new prescription back in the 80s. Had to get new ones every year.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don’t see how lasik could possibly be a cost savings. I’ve gotten fairly nice glasses for $150 without insurance. I’ve gotten glasses for less than that with insurance.

One pair of glasses can last a long time if you take care of them (and if your eyes don’t get worse).

LASIK isn’t a permanent solution and eventually you’ll need glasses again.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

I didn't need glasses for 40 years.

My glasses were costing $500 plus in the 1980s. They needed replacing annually.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

A pair of glasses would have cost me about 350 euros every 3 years. Eye surgery cost me 980 euros and I should not require glasses for at least 20. So surgery has saved me at least 1350 euros. Failing at calculations like that is one more way for the poor to stay poor.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Your last sentence is an example of the Boots Theory

The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. ... A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. ... But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yes and I have read the book this quote is from, but years after I had the operation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn’t translate with Asian countries. Glasses are dirt cheap whereas lasik operations are pretty expensive af.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Which Asian countries? Asia also includes turkey, india, Vietnam, Korea and russia