this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
533 points (97.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

6018 readers
2845 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] namarupa@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Could you help me understand where his argument is specious?

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

His primary argument was all about lifetime earning potential. That is not what salary refers to. So, his argument doesn't actually apply to the allegation. Therefore, it is specious.

[–] namarupa@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I can't see where his argument was about lifetime earning potential. Seems to be just simply women with children make less money, which seems reasonable.

I also don't see anywhere he even implied that salary and lifetime earning potential were the same thing. And salary would be reflected in lifetime earning potential.

What is your position? I'm not even certain what the point of your disagreement is.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I have come to the conclusion that their position is mental illness, because everything they've typed so far is non-sensical.