this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
618 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

11426 readers
1830 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
618
BACK IT UP (mander.xyz)
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
239 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

https://academictorrents.com/

☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️ ☝️

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I also think insurance shouldn't cover cancer treatment for smokers. Or diabetes treatment for overweight people. Or broken bones for skiers. Or literally anything for anyone who has ever done anything bad for them. /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Why shouldn't they be able to sue cigarette companies or companies releasing unsafe products?

Why should my insurance be higher whilst cigarette companies are benefiting off their shit marketing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

One reason why people have historically had trouble suing tobacco companies is that non-smokers also get lung cancer. While we can say for sure that smoking makes it more likely you will get lung cancer, it's generally impossible to say any one person's lung cancer was caused by smoking. This is in contrast to say, someone who injures themselves climbing, where it is definitely 100% on them.

The real answer of course is that you're paying for it either way. Insured people pay absurdly over the odds to offset the amount of money lost on people who accrue medical debt and can't afford to pay it off.