this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
431 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59340 readers
6004 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 105 points 15 hours ago (8 children)

u/Dangerous-Pizza7054 from the article,

Seems like the user tracking "special promotion" overrides the premium. They don't even say whether it's expected or not. But my take away is that paying for premium may or may not show you ads, but you are definitely tracked and harvested for data. (Maybe even more so, since, well, you are more valuable to them.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

We've GOT A PAYERR OVER HEREEEEE!!!!!!!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 hours ago

That has been my specific issue with paying for any Google product always. I understand when I am using a product for free that I am not necessarily the customer and that money has to be made off of me or the users more generally somehow. That's "fine" (ish, not really, but that has more to do with issues of security than anything).

However when I pay for a product or service, I want to now be the customer and I want to be in control of my data and have the company cater to me. If, when paying for a Google service, there was some legally relevant things in place that insured I was no longer being tracked and used to generate revenue via third parties I would gladly pay. Probably more than they are charging now, but instead they want to have it both ways which is just not OK with me.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 hours ago

Well yes, you didn't get first ads. But what about second ads?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

At least a subscription includes YouTube music? Isn't that interesting and relevant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I would cancel that subscription SOOO FAST.

I'd argue that YTMusic is a superior product to YT, but both put together aren't worth anywhere near the cost. You can get a premium TV/Movie service for that price with family access.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

That part of the support email almost made me puke of how fucking awful it was. "Why complain about ads when you get YouTube Music for free by paying us money"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago

Wait, I haven't seen ads on YouTube Premium (yet), and I'm just now realizing this could very likely be because Google knows my wife and I don't watch sports.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

So premium users put their data on a pedestal for Google? That's fun

[–] [email protected] 12 points 14 hours ago

That's generally; if you have an account, you are easier to track for them.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 13 hours ago

I got the same Sunday banner in the middle of the screen similar to where shorts show up. Never in my life have I watched or cared for American football. Clearly a waste of money for the advertising company since I just closed it by pressing the x same as shorts on desktop.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 15 hours ago

ublock is cheaper and actually works