this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
516 points (98.7% liked)

News

23406 readers
3380 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation and architect of Trump’s Project 2025, employs intense fire-related rhetoric in his upcoming book, Dawn’s Early Light: Taking Back Washington to Save America, advocating for a “controlled burn” of institutions he deems corrupt or antithetical to conservative goals.

Roberts calls for dismantling entities like the FBI, Ivy League schools, and the New York Times, framing it as necessary to “renew” America.

His incendiary language has sparked controversy, with critics alarmed by the violent imagery and its implications for Trump’s second term.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

At the end of the day those roadblocks are just laws. Laws that he has been cleared to break as long as he does so under the pretense of an official act.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So technically yes and no. He cant just say he wants to get rid of the fbi or remove term limits at will. Study how the Goverment works

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Their goal is to break it. They control all branches of government. Who is there to stop them?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

They can’t break it though. I mean anything he does deemed unconstitutional can be challenged by any appeals court judge that can strike it down. He needs 2/3 congress approval which he doesn’t have the votes for constitutional changes and changes to the exec branch. Lots of changes are complicated. Even removing the ACA.

Remembered day one in 2017 he had that travel ban? A judge struck it down and they appealed and lost. He doesn’t have a magic wand…

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They didnt have SCOTUS locked down at the time. They do now. They'll appeal any appellate court decision to the Supreme Court, who will find any excuse to rule in their favor. It's already happened with Dobbs, the plaintiff literally had no standing to bring a suit, but SCOTUS said, "We won't worry about that." Then ruled based kn a Brittish law from before we were a country.

You seem to think they believe in the rule of law. They don't. They have spent 50 years preparing for this fucking moment where they can become the ruling class. Look at how Alito and Thomas openly flaunt that they're for sale.

They. Don't. Care.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I hope I’m right and you’re wrong for the sake of our democracy. I hope it lasts more than 250 years

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I hope so too, but the writing is on the wall. People saw Project 2025 and still voted for it. And now they're gonna ram it down our throats.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean anything he does deemed unconstitutional can be challenged by any appeals court judge that can strike it down.

And then appeal it to the SCOTUS who literally gave him criminal immunity. With Congress and SCOTUS, it doesn't matter what the Constitution actually says. Just what they can twist it with paper thin reasoning to mean.

So who's stopping him?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You underestimate the reason we have separation of powers. If Trump wanted to get rid of term limits he would need 2/3 votes from both houses which he doesn’t have and 38 states need to ratify. This also includes with any constitutional change. There’s red tape for a treason

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That amendment really meant consecutive terms. So Trump being president again is fine.

That's just as ridiculous of an argument as the president being criminally immune.

When the branch that has the final say on what the Constitution means is on board, you don't have to actually amend it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

While the powers are separated, if all three are aligned there is nothing they can't do. The supreme court has already demonstrated it's able to reinterpret the constitution in a way no other court has done in history.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

You're not paying attention. They aren't following the old rules anymore. They haven't been for years. They will not be defeated by words on paper.