this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1480 readers
311 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

With the OSI publishing their abysmal - explicitly not open source - "Open Source AI" definition I thought I'd post my argument, why it is bad and why "Open Source AI" currently probably does not exist.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JFranek@awful.systems 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, neural network training is notoriously easy to reproduce /s.

Just few things can affect results: source data, data labels, network structure, training parameters, version of training script, versions of libraries, seed for random number generator, hardware, operating system.

Also, deployment is another can of worms.

Also, even if you have open source script, data and labels, there's no guarantee you'll have useful documentation for either of these.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, that just reiterates my point, doesn't it?

[–] JFranek@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It was supposed to. I'm just not that good at writing.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 5 points 1 month ago

Fair enough. Sorry for being rude about it.