this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
138 points (97.3% liked)

Fediverse vs Disinformation

444 readers
51 users here now

Pointing out, debunking, and spreading awareness about state- and company-sponsored astroturfing on Lemmy and elsewhere. This includes social media manipulation, propaganda, and disinformation campaigns, among others.

Propaganda and disinformation are a big problem on the internet, and the Fediverse is no exception.

What's the difference between misinformation and disinformation? The inadvertent spread of false information is misinformation. Disinformation is the intentional spread of falsehoods.

By equipping yourself with knowledge of current disinformation campaigns by state actors, corporations and their cheerleaders, you will be better able to identify, report and (hopefully) remove content matching known disinformation campaigns.


Community rules

Same as instance rules, plus:

  1. No disinformation
  2. Posts must be relevant to the topic of astroturfing, propaganda and/or disinformation

Related websites


Matrix chat links

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

When I looked into claims about Congress being lazy I learned a lot about how more bills used to be passed, but the bills were small. As time went on, less bills were passed but they had more in them. Which means that saying Congress is doing less because there's less bills doesn't really fit reality and how you'd talk about Congress if you knew anything about Congress. But politifact scores this as mostly true with a small tidbit where an expert brings up this exact problem; go by content, not bill numbers. You have to do work and think about what Congress is doing instead of picking a number out of a hat.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Which in turn highlights the problem with all these omnibus bills where you have to vote for the bombs for genocide bill if you want school lunch funding. Doesn't invalidate your point, but US politics is beyond bonkers.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Back in the 90s there use to be this cool thing called the “line item veto” where the president could strike certain parts of a bill and congress would need 2/3 to put it back in. Really helped with these omnibus bills, but congress didn’t like that the president could see through the bullshit and voted to take it away, so now it’s back to all or nothing

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Congress didn't take it away. The Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution doesn't give the President the power to veto just one part of a bill. The veto is an all or nothing power. (Which also how the UK royal assent worked at the time the US Constitution was written.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Ah thank you for the clarification

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago

Not sure how to say this, but there is a whole other layer of discussion regarding how much of that added stuff in recent bills is functional and "on task" so to speak vs blatant "Pork" meant to buy votes from various senators. In my opinion, anything off task from the bill's header intent does not count towards "productivity".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

it's also not about being "lazy" but republicans becoming more and more obstructive since newt Gingrich, and now they are even obstructing themselves. just look at how hard it is to pick a Speaker or pass a simple budget. very little is going to pass unless you have a strong majority.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I think this whole question and analysis begs the question that the number of bills passed is even a good metric. The point of Congress isn't simply to churn out legislation for the sake of churning out legislation. And this metric sets aside other stuff Congress does completely, like confirming appointments, or overseeing the actions of Federal Departments. House Oversight Committee meetings aren't flashy, nor do they often result in legislation. But, they are vital to keeping an eye on what the rest of the government is doing.

I won't disagree that this Congress has been a shitshow. But, I just don't buy that the "number of bills passed" is a particularly useful measure of Congress.