this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
104 points (98.1% liked)
Economics
444 readers
93 users here now
founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Boeing could pay them a 35% bump retroactive to the start of the year, guarantee them an inflation linked annual increase starting at 10%, and give them a beautiful pension.
They don't, because Boeing is run by money men now, and not engineers. Besides, it's not much a gamble when they can be confident in the worst scenarios, the workers get ordered back to work, or Boeing gets bailed out after losing all their money due to the strike. It's a win win win when your underlying goal is to not pay people what they're worth.
9% a year for the next four years doesn't even make up for the last four years of 'inflation'. I wouldn't take that deal either.
What do you mean? Boeing can bark orders how long and how loud they want, why would the workers return if their conditions aren't met?
It is a bit ambiguous, isn't it. To clarify, I'm talking about Boeing lobbying the government to end strike action and force the union to accept terms whether or not they want to.
It's happened in America, and it's happened in cold America.
What.The.Fuck