this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
88 points (94.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7211 readers
239 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On a chilly, early morning in January 2019, a group of animal rights activists descended upon a poultry farm in central Texas. Donning plastic gloves, medical masks, hazmat suits, and T-shirts emblazoned with “Meat the Victims,” they slipped through the unlocked door of a massive, windowless barn.

Inside, they found 27,000 chicks densely packed across the floor, like “just a sea of yellow,” recalled Sarah Weldon, one of the activists. “There were a lot of chicks that were already deceased, in various stages of decomposition,” she said. “Some were so deformed you couldn’t even tell they used to be baby chicks, just fluffs of feathers.”

Activists with Meat the Victims, a decentralized, global movement to abolish animal exploitation, later uploaded gruesome photos of injured and dead chicks to social media platforms. This is how, Weldon suspects, the police identified her and issued a warrant for her arrest, along with 14 other activists. She was charged with criminal trespassing, a Class B misdemeanor, and quickly turned herself into jail.

The FBI has been collaborating with the meat industry to gather information on animal rights activism, including Meat the Victims, under its directive to counter weapons of mass destruction, or WMD, according to agency records recently obtained by the nonprofit Animal Partisan through Freedom of Information Act litigation. The records also show that the bureau has explored charging activists who break into factory farms under federal criminal statutes that carry a possible sentence of up to life in prison — including for the “attempted use” of WMD — while urging meat producers to report encounters with activists to its WMD program.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I think they're mixing up terrorism and activism. i hope not deliberately. hint: terrorism instills fear, while activism is at worst a nuisance.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i hope not deliberately.

No one familiar the history of the FBI would give it the benefit of the doubt. The FBI is just cops at the federal level. Their core function is to protect the means of production for the capitalist class, same as in town.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, the FBI only exists to protect the wealthy corporate interests and maintain the status quo. Occasionally catching serial killers or corrupt politicians is just window dressing for the taxpayers. Even corrupt politicians are only a target when they piss off the powers that be.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Terrorism is whatever vaguely liberatory activity the Atlantic Consensus doesn't like.

Environmentalists have been categorized as terrorists for destroying private property. The ANC was classified as terrorists for fighting back against apartheid.

This particular tendency in labelling goes back to the 60s in labeling Palestinian liberation groups terrorists. The Zionists forcing people from their homes at gunpoint and threatening worse if they resist? Never labeled terrorists. The people who did organize and resist? Called terrorists.

The common theme is not even a selective application of the term ("our freedom fighters, their terrorists"), it is just organizing concretely for liberation that runs counter to Western interests.

Samidoun was just labelled a terrorist org. Samidoun organizes many of the pro-Palestine marches and protests you've seen and/or participated in over the last year. During the same period the US supplied Zionists with tens of billions in weapons and cash so that they could bomb refugee camps, schools, and hospitals.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

“This kind of escalation in charging or threats of charges is textbook escalation by government actors against successful efforts by social movements that they disagree with or find subversive,” said Justin Marceau, a law professor who runs a legal clinic for animal activists at the University of Denver. “The very framing of civil disobedience against factory farms as terrorism is a form of government repression.”