this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
284 points (95.2% liked)

politics

19043 readers
3856 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 36 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

She's someone I really want to deep dive, but I have never taken the time. Her monologue that begins at 1:24 minutes into this clip was my first exposure to her and I love that moment when you realize these awful examples she's citing are not just awful in their own right, but that they drive home her undeniable point at the end, in response to what sounds like it was a bullshit question.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

She’s lived a really full life. Even her Wikipedia page is a good overview. She’s the type of activist a lot of keyboard warriors would like to pretend they are.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Did the wiki happen to mention the Marin County courthouse?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Yes. A pretty detailed write up as well. Seems like an easy thing to look up.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but then he couldn't be here just asking questions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Can I be here just asking questions?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 46 minutes ago

Sure you can, you don't need my permission. Will they be disingenuous questions or actual questions? :)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Met Angela in the Haight. She was with Katie Cleaver, Eldrige's wife. Amazing how one can quickly turn from helping murder people to a "political activist'. I don't think I need to look it up,

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

She explicitly did not help murder people. She was literally acquitted. Maybe you do need to look it up.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Then you should have just opened with calling her a murderer instead of your rather coy question about the courthouse, as if somehow that event would have been omitted when it's a rather famous part of her history.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

OK buddy. You were just asking questions right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Did she buy guns?

Were those guns used in a murder?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 50 minutes ago* (last edited 33 minutes ago) (1 children)

Oh look you you can almost speak your point non-disingenuously after all.

You can think whatever you like of Angela Davis, that's not for me to decide (and despite multiple comments from you, I'm still not sure what that is), I just wish you wouldn't have tried so hard to coyly imply instead of stating it. Thanks for almost coming out and making a plain point.

As for me,

"On June 4, 1972, after 13 hours of deliberations, the all-white jury returned a verdict of not guilty."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 28 minutes ago

Asking questions you don't answer. The answer to both is demonstrably yes, BTW. So, there are families with missing members. The way it goes I guess.

Second time you've called me coy, BTW. For someone who learns from a wiki, I suppose I am.

Angela, despite what her wiki might say, has a jaded past. People who are guilty are acquitted every day. The reverse is also true. The law is not perfect.